Astrophysics - The red giant sun-lie |
| home | webmaster | about us | contact | sitemap |
Octobre 24, 2009/July 23, 2010
Astrophysics - The red dwarfPreface from Pierluigi PeruzziThe theory of "red sun" which states that "the sun itself swells as time goes, then later becomes a red dwarf star", makes me laugh. Specifically that the sun, before it ends, still swoop up quickly the earth, appears very human to me; however, it is not objective and not physically true. So I have made my own theory to red sun. Therefore, I am agreeing with the rest of the humankind: sooner or later, our sun become a red star. Only that the sequence is, for sure, not the same. We must not forget that the first theory of the "red giant" emerged in the time stems where it was believed that the electrons around whirr in a ridiculous switchback about the atomic nucleus. Also, it is said from old books you could read that the electricity consisted of an unknown fluid. |
CAUTION:
|
|
|
1. Introduction1.1. The gravityFirst, to better explain, we need to deal with the gravitational force on the surface of a celestial body. In each "theory of red giant stars", there is gravitation and mass in the star. One good example is the planet earth. |
|
General formula of gravitation:
coefficient of gravity x mass radius2 |
The earth for an example = 9,8m/s2:
(6.673 x 10-11m3/kg s2) x (5,954 x 1024kg) 6,37 x 106m x 6,37 x 106m |
1.2. Example of two different ball-shaped celestial body![]() To better explain my theory, requires a very pronounced example of two different celestial bodies. One of the two celestial bodies has less diameter and less mass than the other, but has more gravity on its surface. This is important for my theory. Here is an example calculation of 2 different ball-shaped celestial bodies: |
| Celestial body A: | Celestial body B: |
| radius 1000 km | radius 400 km |
| consists of pure water ice H2O | consists of pure lead Pb |
| specific weight about 1.0 g/cm3 | specific weight about 11.34 g/cm3 |
| volume 4'188'790'204 km3 | volume 268'082'573 km3 |
| mass 4,18879 x 1021kg | mass 3,040 x 1021kg |
|
Gravity on the surface of |
Gravity on the surface of |
|
(6.673 x 10-11m3/kg s2) x (4,18879 x 1021kg) 10 x 106m x 10 x 106m |
(6.673 x 10-11m3/kg s2) x (3,040 x 1021kg) 4 x 105m x 4 x 105m |
|
Important: In this example has the smallest and lightest celestial body a much higher gravity on the surface as the larger one, because be more specific weight by far is higher! |
2. My real theory2.1. The phases of the shutdown of the sun
|
Phase 1 yesterday |
![]() |
Phase 2 today |
![]() |
Phase 3 tomorrow |
![]() |
Phase 4 the day after tomorrow
|
![]() |
|
We could say that with the increased specific gravity that holds our sun, gravity on the surface is stronger. This must not put confusion to the effective gravitational attraction of the celestial body. That has fallen! Now our sun will be a red dwarf!Without having itself inflated and swallowing up any planet! Addendum from November 5, 2009Into discussion forums I had an indoctrination, that after the internal nuclear fusion (hydrogen is merging into helium), a nuclear fusion will occur in the outer rind of the star.
We must not forget that a star is in the form of liquids or gases. This means that all the matter of a star is always shuffled in and out. Well then, allow me to ask a last question: |
| site map | your feedbacks | Copyright © 2009.10 Pierluigi Peruzzi (links allowed) |